<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><description>Personal blog. Mostly photos.</description><title>Daniel Pietzsch</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @danielpietzsch)</generator><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/</link><item><title>January 2019 – Daniel Pietzsch’s Photo Journal</title><description>&lt;a href="http://photojournal.danielpietzsch.com/2019/January.html"&gt;January 2019 – Daniel Pietzsch’s Photo Journal&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;Boom! Another journal entry!&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/187784507953</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/187784507953</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:42:11 +0200</pubDate><category>photos</category><category>film photography</category><category>journal</category></item><item><title>December 2018 – Daniel Pietzsch’s Photo Journal</title><description>&lt;a href="http://photojournal.danielpietzsch.com/2018/December.html"&gt;December 2018 – Daniel Pietzsch’s Photo Journal&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;Finally wrapping up 2018.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/187583795128</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/187583795128</guid><pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2019 22:48:38 +0200</pubDate><category>photos</category><category>film photography</category><category>journal</category></item><item><title>November 2018 – Daniel Pietzsch’s Photo Journal</title><description>&lt;a href="http://photojournal.danielpietzsch.com/2018/November.html"&gt;November 2018 – Daniel Pietzsch’s Photo Journal&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;I wouldn’t call it “catching up on my photo blog”, but at least here’s another post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/186264727233</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/186264727233</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Jul 2019 22:52:00 +0200</pubDate><category>photos</category><category>film photography</category><category>journal</category></item><item><title>Ok, finally put up the scanner at the new apartment. Catching up on scanning&amp;hellip;</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, finally put up the scanner at the new apartment. Catching up on scanning&amp;hellip;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184720073323</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184720073323</guid><pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2019 22:23:59 +0200</pubDate><category>365writings</category><category>journal</category><category>film photography</category></item><item><title>October 2018 – Daniel Pietzsch’s Photo Journal</title><description>&lt;a href="http://photojournal.danielpietzsch.com/2018/October.html"&gt;October 2018 – Daniel Pietzsch’s Photo Journal&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;p&gt;My selected photos from last October. Mostly shots from Paris.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m pretty happy with how they turned out. Especially the ones from the Rolleiflex.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184690183483</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184690183483</guid><pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2019 16:24:23 +0200</pubDate><category>photos</category><category>film photography</category><category>journal</category><category>believeinfilm</category><category>365writings</category></item><item><title>Panoramic cameras</title><description>&lt;p&gt;At some point I want one. A Widelux. A Horizon. Or even an XPan. Maybe a cheap Sprocket Rocket at first.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I was just looking at &lt;a href="https://www.jeffbridges.com/true_grit_book/"&gt;some of Jeff Bridges’ photos&lt;/a&gt;, and really like how he uses the Widelux to document the making of the movies he’s starring in. I mean, they are interesting and unique pictures to begin with, but that wide frame makes them even more so.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;figure data-orig-height="512" data-orig-width="1280"&gt;&lt;img src="https://64.media.tumblr.com/0b2394839d31ce2b5bd27b6a0ffe4cc7/036a6dbcd6bef124-4f/s540x810/1ab9def70b06c740ed64ee0aff153f5e98b72fba.jpg" data-orig-height="512" data-orig-width="1280"/&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;Jeff Bridges on the &amp;ldquo;True Grit&amp;rdquo; set. © Jeff Bridges&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;/figure&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184559353863</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184559353863</guid><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 23:40:56 +0200</pubDate><category>365writings</category><category>writings</category><category>journal</category><category>film photography</category></item><item><title>Pulling film you don’t know the development time for</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently had to pull-develop a roll of APX 400, which I unintentionally had exposed at EI200 or even EI100. And I couldn’t find developing times for XTOL online for pulling APX. &lt;a href="https://www.flickr.com/groups/42106791@N00/discuss/72157594294216022/72157594294622655"&gt;But I found an entry in a Flickr group, that suggested using 2/3s of the original developing time per stop pulled&lt;/a&gt;. That sounded reasonable. So, for my APX 400 in XTOL 1:1, this meant instead of 12 minutes at 20 ℃, I developed for 8 minutes. The negatives came out looking fine.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(This little accident happened, because I loaded APX 400 via a bulk-rolled canister with a 200 ISO DX code into my Leica Mini, which is an automated camera, where you can’t set the ISO manually. And the DX code was even partially covered by tape that I used to label the film. The tape meant, the camera might not have been able to read the DX code at all, making it fall back to its default ISO setting. Which is probably ISO 100 from what I gathered online. Either way, I ended up with an overexposed roll. The question was if it was one stop or two. I decided it was two. But I only compensated for &lt;i&gt;one&lt;/i&gt; stop in development, as I thought it’s probably safer to overdevelop a little bit, rather than ending up with too-thin negatives in case it was actually only one stop overexposed.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184534586948</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184534586948</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2019 22:25:12 +0200</pubDate><category>365writings</category><category>writings</category><category>journal</category><category>film photography</category></item><item><title>I found this old photo from 2013 in my drafts, and I must say...</title><description>&lt;img src="https://64.media.tumblr.com/5150c3cf6169f8f182048e96966eba75/tumblr_myxm1zt6mz1qa3r7do1_500.jpg"/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;I found this old photo from 2013 in my drafts, and I must say I’m rather pleased with the quality of this scan. I’m pretty sure, this roll was developed and scanned by &lt;a href="http://www.fotogoertz.com"&gt;Foto Görtz&lt;/a&gt; here in Düsseldorf. I don’t know what they were (or are) using, but I’m sure it’s something better than the flatbed scanner I use.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is Kodak Gold 200, shot with a Nikon FE and the 50mm f/1.8 E lens.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/tagged/Rome"&gt;Here’s more from our Rome trip 5 years ago&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184489304308</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184489304308</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2019 23:54:57 +0200</pubDate><category>photos</category><category>Film</category><category>Nikon FE</category><category>Rome</category><category>film photography</category><category>365writings</category><category>journal</category></item><item><title>Vinegar stop bath</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently I learned &lt;a href="https://youtu.be/IAAIQWQKCKg?t=1560"&gt;you can use diluted vinegar essence as the stop bath when developing film&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup id="fnref:1"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt;. That comes in timely since I’m running out of the dedicated stop bath chemical very soon.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know some people simply use water as a stop bath. And I was contemplating trying this approach. But I often read it’s not ideal, because it’ll exhaust the fixer more quickly. And since I now found out about the vinegar approach, I think I’m going to try that instead.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes"&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li id="fn:1" role="doc-endnote"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the (German) video, they don’t tell exactly how &lt;em&gt;much&lt;/em&gt; diluted: the only say “a dash of vinegar”. &lt;a href="https://bildermann.de/fotograf/schwarz-weiss-dunkelkammer/schwarz-weiss-negativfilme-entwickeln_9586/#schritt"&gt;On another site I’m told roughly 1 tablespoon on a litre of water&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink"&gt;↩︎&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184318307138</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184318307138</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2019 16:05:33 +0200</pubDate><category>365writings</category><category>writings</category><category>film photography</category></item><item><title>Bulk loading problems</title><description>&lt;p&gt;When you miscount and think you have &lt;a href="http://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/183683322158/bulk-loading-film-tips"&gt;bulk loaded&lt;/a&gt; one roll &lt;i&gt;more&lt;/i&gt; than you actually have, you run into some problems. When you think, ‘ok, yes, that last roll often has a few more frames on it’ and keep winding but it doesn’t stop even at a frame count of fifty, there has to be something wrong. This just happened to me. And now I have one very very full canister with 50+ frames and one with around 30, which could have easily used another 10 more frames.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One should probably always stop when the canister is full enough. At the worst you’ll have so little film left unspooled, it doesn’t make sense for another roll. But I think that’s better than having to deal with a fat 50-frame roll, where I’m unsure, if it’ll be usable in any camera without issues or whether it’ll fit in the developing tank. I’ll probably just waste a few centimetres and trim that one down to 40+ exposures before using it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184301639243</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184301639243</guid><pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2019 22:00:53 +0200</pubDate><category>365writings</category><category>journal</category><category>photography</category><category>film photography</category><category>writings</category></item><item><title>Guessing exposure</title><description>&lt;p&gt;To reduce my reliance on an external light meter, most times I guess and set my exposure &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; taking a meter reading. This makes me assess the available light first and makes think about what the exposure might be. When – or even &lt;i&gt;if&lt;/i&gt; – I then take a meter reading, I’ll correct my aperture and shutter speed settings, if need be.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I found this to be a very effective way to get better at guessing exposure. Outdoors, I use &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunny_16_rule"&gt;the sunny 16 rule&lt;/a&gt; as my guidance, of course. For indoors, I mainly rely on experience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;figure data-orig-width="1280" data-orig-height="1280" class="tmblr-full"&gt;&lt;img src="https://64.media.tumblr.com/3e0523193080e7cf49edb275341a226f/tumblr_inline_ppyynldZts1qzm9x2_540.jpg" data-orig-width="1280" data-orig-height="1280"/&gt;&lt;/figure&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184187043488</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184187043488</guid><pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2019 23:10:08 +0200</pubDate><category>365writings</category><category>writings</category><category>photography</category><category>film photography</category><category>photos</category></item><item><title>Why I love shooting film: The challenge</title><description>&lt;p&gt;There’s something very rewarding about being able to operate an all-manual film camera and produce useable images with it. You have to get the exposure right, the timing, the focus, the framing; you often need a steady hand in low light; and developing the film needs to be done correctly, too.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I do use a light meter app on my phone to help me with setting the exposure, though, but that’s about it for additional technical help. A meter simply makes me more confident in dialling in my exposure. But – to be honest – more often than not, I guess (or even know) the exposure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And I could shoot more automatic film cameras to help me out. But I prefer &lt;a href="http://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/182855136528/why-i-love-shooting-film-the-cameras"&gt;those manual mechanical ones&lt;/a&gt;. This might be making it unnecessarily hard for myself, but that’s exactly the challenge I like so much. But just because I’m using these manual tools, doesn’t mean I’m automatically taking better pictures, of course. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And to end this not on a more modest note: once you start shooting film and use manual cameras – while at first indeed challenging – you’ll notice it’s actually &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; that hard. I got used to this way of shooting and now prefer it over using all sorts of automatics. It makes for a more controlled, quicker, and more enjoyable experience for me. And it’s a more calm way of shooting, without many buttons to push or looking at flashing lights or screens.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But still: it’s a nice feeling having captured an image where I was 100% responsible for all the technical settings and processes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;figure data-orig-width="1280" data-orig-height="1920" class="tmblr-full"&gt;&lt;img src="https://64.media.tumblr.com/d4165c62107b3b21f39621ef0745de6a/tumblr_inline_ppx1h8NdSY1qzm9x2_540.jpg" data-orig-width="1280" data-orig-height="1920"/&gt;&lt;/figure&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184162222438</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/184162222438</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2019 22:18:58 +0200</pubDate><category>365writings</category><category>writings</category><category>photography</category><category>film photography</category><category>whyiloveshootingfilm</category><category>photos</category></item><item><title>Bulk loading film tips</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Since I started &lt;a href="http://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/183617258593/bulk-loading-film"&gt;bulk loading my own film&lt;/a&gt;, I’ve collected a few notes and tips on how to make it all work smoothly and consistently. Plus, I have some extra tips on using those rolls in a Leica M.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To understand these tips, you’ll already have to know how to operate your daylight film loader. If you don’t, here’s a video explaining it in great detail using a Watson loader, which is very similar to mine: &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Evk_oR7TO1o"&gt;How To: Bulk Loading Film&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;figure data-orig-height="960" data-orig-width="1280"&gt;&lt;img src="https://64.media.tumblr.com/76ca23a08083c0a0b0f7b18d8f1035e4/913bbf2eb1de216f-f5/s540x810/a0a7fa75610d3b0a1c582d55879bd997dd2da199.jpg" data-orig-height="960" data-orig-width="1280"/&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;My Computrol bulk film loader&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;/figure&gt;&lt;p&gt;I’m using a Computrol 35mm bulk film loader. So that’s what these tips refer to. If you’re using a different style of loader, some might still apply, but some might not.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;rsquo;s get started:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Canister loading tips&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Currently, I&amp;rsquo;m using standard, already used 35mm film canisters and roll the bulk film onto them. For this, I tape the film from the bulk roll to the little bit remaining film that&amp;rsquo;s still attached to the canister. Here&amp;rsquo;s a video that shows how this works: &lt;a href="https://youtu.be/eQfKUzk-zvw?t=600"&gt;Bulk Load Film Tutorial&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, first some tips for inserting the film cassette and getting everything ready:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Make sure you tape on the film straight. Otherwise it won&amp;rsquo;t wind on nicely.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Before inserting it into the loader, manually wind in the taped part, so the Tesa/Scotch tape won&amp;rsquo;t get stuck on the outside of the canister once you start using the crank.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If you &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; run into problems winding on the film, don&amp;rsquo;t force it. It should work without much resistance. If that&amp;rsquo;s not the case, better start over.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Before starting to spool on, don&amp;rsquo;t forget to open the gate, so the film doesn&amp;rsquo;t get scratched and you can effortlessly turn the crank.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;If you&amp;rsquo;re doing this for the first time – or haven&amp;rsquo;t done it for a while – load your film in a dim environment. Should you then have an accidental light leak, it won&amp;rsquo;t be as severe.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Winding tip: Load for one complete counter run&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you’re aiming for getting eighteen 36-exposure rolls out of your 30.5 meters (100 ft) of film, make sure you wind on a full counter run, which is 40 &amp;ldquo;clicks&amp;rdquo; or frames. So, before loading a new roll, I set my counter to “0” and wind on 40 clicks, until it’s back at “0” (which is equal to “40”).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;figure data-orig-height="960" data-orig-width="1280"&gt;&lt;img src="https://64.media.tumblr.com/d5ff82dc89f9d09530b3d0e3c63edc64/913bbf2eb1de216f-31/s540x810/b776287adde45a4724ed1f9cfe5d99a75f301ad2.jpg" data-orig-height="960" data-orig-width="1280"/&gt;&lt;figcaption&gt;The frame counter&lt;/figcaption&gt;&lt;/figure&gt;&lt;p&gt;With this method, I always get 18 rolls out of the 30.5 meters and each roll has at least 36 exposures on them. Plus, the counter is already reset for the next roll.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;Canister unloading tips&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When you wound on you film, it&amp;rsquo;s time to get the freshly loaded canister out of the loader.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Take out the spool &lt;em&gt;before&lt;/em&gt; cutting it loose. This way it&amp;rsquo;s much easier to cut the film with scissors.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Cut the film relatively close to the canister. I usually cut after two sprockets. I found there&amp;rsquo;s already enough film in the canister for my 36+ exposures. No need to have even more on that roll. (Plus, then there&amp;rsquo;s already enough film sticking out of the loader for the next roll.)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Put some bright tape on the loader and use a pen to keep track of how many rolls you&amp;rsquo;ve already loaded. I found the built-in &amp;ldquo;meters/feet left&amp;rdquo; counter unreliable and tedious.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Tips for using bulk loaded film in a Leica M&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When you shoot a bulk-loaded roll, you can&amp;rsquo;t simply shoot it until you can&amp;rsquo;t advance to the next frame any more. Because you would lose a frame or so at the end, since during the loading process &lt;em&gt;both&lt;/em&gt; ends of the roll were exposed to light. So, you need to pay attention towards the end of the roll, to know when the film is full.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;rsquo;s what I do to make sure I don&amp;rsquo;t lose any frames with my M:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Before inserting the film, make sure the shutter is cocked or has just been fired. That way, each time you wind on a fresh film, the travel will be the same for the first one to two advances.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Waste the first frame.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Start shooting at frame count &amp;ldquo;0&amp;rdquo;. (Now, to be 100% sure you get a full frame on this first shot, I&amp;rsquo;d waste one more and start at &amp;ldquo;1&amp;rdquo;.)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Shoot until and including frame &amp;ldquo;38&amp;rdquo;. Once the counter &lt;em&gt;hits&lt;/em&gt; &amp;ldquo;39&amp;rdquo;, the film is full. (Sometimes that&amp;rsquo;s not the case and you get one more shot out of the roll, though. Which happens to me accidentally, when I don&amp;rsquo;t pay attention.)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;Shooting my M4-2 from frame &amp;ldquo;0&amp;rdquo; to &amp;ldquo;38&amp;rdquo; indeed gives me 39 fully exposed frames most times. Occasionally, the first or last frame are incomplete. But it&amp;rsquo;s recently always been at least 38 frames.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/183683322158</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/183683322158</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2019 23:29:09 +0100</pubDate><category>writings</category><category>365writings</category><category>photography</category><category>film photography</category></item><item><title>Bulk Loading Film</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve discovered &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Evk_oR7TO1o"&gt;bulk loading of film&lt;/a&gt; for myself. It’s like rolling your own cigarettes – but for film. I &lt;em&gt;think&lt;/em&gt;. Because I never smoked.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyhow, I do it to save money. Others do it to be able to fill canisters with a different number of frames each roll. But I don’t do that.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Rolling your own &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; more time consuming than simply buying a pre-made 35mm canister. Plus you need to factor in the costs – albeit small – for the machine you need to be able to load the film in the first place. So, I would only recommend it to people who shoot film frequently.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But if you do, it’s well worth it. &lt;a href="https://www.nordfoto.de"&gt;From where I buy&lt;/a&gt;, one roll of HP5 bulk-loaded is approximately €4 instead of €5.40&lt;sup id="fnref:1"&gt;&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; when bought standard. Furthermore I get to shoot cheaper films even cheaper. I recently shot a lot of APX 400. Bulk loading this brings its price per roll down from €4.50 to approximately €2.60. And that’s a nice price for a roll of a good black and white film.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;div class="footnotes" role="doc-endnotes"&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li id="fn:1" role="doc-endnote"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A 10-pack of HP5 is currently €54.60. A 30.5 meter bulk film roll is ~€73, which I get 18 36-exposure films out of. &lt;a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-backref" role="doc-backlink"&gt;↩︎&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;

&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/183617258593</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/183617258593</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2019 23:58:32 +0100</pubDate><category>writings</category><category>365writings</category><category>film photography</category></item><item><title>I’m going to do my last film development in the current flat to wrap up this day. Four rolls of APX...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I’m going to do my last film development in the current flat to wrap up this day. Four rolls of APX 400 @1600​ in XTOL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There’s a bottle of Flens in the fridge and Matt Day has a new video up. That’ll keep me entertained while in the bathroom.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/183593467763</link><guid>https://blog.danielpietzsch.com/post/183593467763</guid><pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2019 22:39:08 +0100</pubDate><category>365writings</category><category>journal</category><category>film photography</category></item></channel></rss>
